Sunday, 22 September 2013

LITERARY LEGAL QUOTATIONS — PART 2

WILLIAM FAULKNER.
 

. . . too many of us not because of the room we take up but because we are willing to sell liberty short at any tawdry price for the sake of what we call our own which is a constitutional statutory licence to pursue each his private postulate of happiness and contentment regardless of grief and cost even to the crucifixion of someone whose nose or pigment we don’t like  and even these can be coped with provided that few of others who believe that a human lie is valuable simply because it has a right to keep o breathing no matter what pigment its lungs distend or nose inhales the air and are willing to defend that right at any price . . .  

Intruder in the Dust

 
. . . since what sets a man writhing sleepless in bad at night is not having injured his fellow so much as having been wrong; the mere injury (if he cannot justify it with what he calls logic) he can efface by destroying the victim and the witnesses but the mistake is his and that is one of the cats which he always prefers to choke to death with butter. 

Intruder in the Dust 


Thou shalt not kill you see – no accusative, heartless: a simple moral precept; we have accepted it in the distant anonymity of our forefathers, had it so long cherished it, fed it, kept the sound of it alive and the very words themselves unchanged, handled it so long that all the corners are now worn smoothly off; we can sleep right in the bed with it; we have even distilled our own antidotes for it as the foresighted housewife keeps  a solution if mustard or handy eggwhites on the same shelf with the rat poison; as familiar as grandpa’s face, as unrecognizable as grandpa’s face beneath the turban of an Indian prince, as abstract as grandpa’s flatulence at the family supper-table; even when it breaks down and the spilled blood stands sharp and glaring in our faces we still have the percept, still intact, still true: we shall not kill and maybe next time we even wont. But thou shalt not kill thy mother’s child. It came right down into the street that time to walk in broad daylight at your elbow, didn’t it?’

 Intruder in the Dust

 
 . . murderers are gamblers and like the amateur gambler the amateur murderer believes first not in his luck but in long shots, that the long shot will win simply because it’s a long shot . . .

 Intruder in the Dust

 

Some things you must always be unable to bear. Some things you must never stop refusing to bear. Injustice and outrage and dishonour and shame. No matter how young you are or how old you have got. Not for kudos and not for cash: your picture in the paper nor money in the bank either. Just refuse to bear them. (p. 733) 

Intruder in the Dust 

 
Sitting around in a lawyer’s office until twelve o’ clock at night is no place for a lady.

 Intruder in the Dust

 
 . . one shame if shame must be, one expiation since expiation must surely be but above all one unalterable durable impregnable one: one people one heart one land: . . .

 Intruder in the Dust
 

. . . how of all human pursuits murder has the most deadly need of privacy; how man will go to almost any lengths to preserve the solitude in which he evacuates or makes love but he will go to any length for that in which he takes life, even to homicide, yet by no act can he more completely and irrevocably destroy it:

 Intruder in the Dust

 
It was of brick, square, proportioned, with four brick columns in shallow basrelief  across the front and even brick cornice under the eaves because it was old, but built in a time when people took time to build even jails with grace and care and he remembered how his uncle had said once that not courthouses nor even churches  but jails were the true records of a country’s, a community’s, history, since not only the cryptic forgotten initials and words and even phrases cries of defiance and indictment scathed into the walls but the very bricks and stones themselves held, not in solution but in suspension, intact and biding and potent and indestructible, the agonies and shames and grieves with which hearts long since unmarked and unremembered dust had strained  and perhaps burst.

 Intruder in the Dust

 
But the lawyer should know all the facts, everything. He is the one to decide what to tell and what not to tell. Else, why have one? That’s like paying a dentist to fix your teeth and then refusing to let him look into your mouth, don’t you see? You wouldn’t treat a dentist or a doctor this way.’

Sanctuary

 
When a man swaps horse for horse, that’s one thing and let the devil protect him if the devil can. But when cash money starts changing hands, that’s something else. And for a stranger to come in and start that cash money to changing and jumping from one fellow to another, it’s like when a burglar breaks into your house and flings your things ever which way even if he dont take nothing. It makes you twice as mad.

 The Hamlet

 
f a fellow’s got to choose between a man that is a murderer and one he just thinks maybe is, he’ll choose the murderer. At least then he will know exactly where he’s at. His attention aint going to wander then.

 
The Hamlet

No comments:

Post a Comment